Wednesday, February 15, 2012

The Orientalist Perspective as an Enframing Discourse



In class, we discussed that orientalism is an enframing discourse. The word oriental itself comes from the word orient, which means the east, while the occident is the west. The orientalist perspective is the perspective used to depict a subject from the Eastern culture. As we focused on the Middle East we watched a movie about the book Orientalism written by Edward Said.

He used art as a means to show the West’s depiction of the Middle Eastern culture. We used the knowledge from this book to reanalyze the book we previously read, Colonizing Egypt. The movie talked about how the depiction of people who visited the middle-east made a lot of stereotypical accuses. These people made people in the Middle East look frightening. They created a representation of Arab people that does not really represent the Arab people as a whole. For example, they show through the art works how the men always have a long beard, scary eyes, and always get beaten in war.

In colonizing Egypt, Timothy Mitchell also did the same thing, when he explained how the France rebuilt Egypt in their World Exhibitions. Through the eyes of the western world, Egypt was rebuilt in an exact way how it looks in the outside, but not really in the inside. In the video, we might agree that most Arab men have a long beard but their personalities, which was depicted as scary and heartless, was wrong.

To some extent, I would agree with Said Edwards when he said that the North American perspectives of the Middle East in general are politicized by the Israel. This racism towards the Middle East people, are more and less one of the important reasons to consider when we analyze the reason for the conflicts between these two regions. Said Edwards, repeated how since the early days of film, when media started revolutionizing, the Middle East was already represented negatively.  The “threatening and demonizing figure of Middle East in the Journal, Media, and Hollywood”, showed how fanatic and extremist the region is. Not just the Middle East, Said Edwards also discussed about how Islam is seen by the western. He said that, Islam is seen to promote violence repeating the line of development. Muslims are seen as villains and they came out with the ideology that it is hard to deal with the Nulsims and make them listen, so the only way of doing it is “to give them a bloody nose”.  Islam has been depicted as the enemy, and that there is no knowledge that can confront this unless the good western people go to the Middle East and experience the culture themselves.

Mitchell also analyzed enframing. He talked about the way the new city of Cairo which is structured or built in the panoptical model, which is how the prisons are built nowadays..  This building style is where all the activities of the area can be monitored from the center.  The “new methods of order were seeking to penetrate, colonize, and multiply” (Mitchel, 4). In this way, everyone is under control, and that everyone will start adapting to feel in control, so they will not go against order. This is an example of enframing, as enframing means a creation of a fixed hierarchy of meanings with the aim of creating a systematic knowledge and/or explaining the useful potential of an object or person. I hope this essay shows how enframing is an orientalist perspective.

Rossa D.

1 comment:

  1. Rossa,
    I think you did a wonderful job summing up Said's argument in the video we watch and connecting it with Mitchell's Colonizing Egypt. Overall, I think what you said is a very nice and simple way to understand the current relationship between the East and the West. Said and Mitchell as you said are just giving different examples of the perception of the East by the West. While Said has his own approach that he calls Orientalism and which he defines as how we perceive people of the East through the creation of myths and power structure and gives examples about Art and the drawing of men and women, Mitchell talks about the World as an exhibition giving examples of France and Egypt as you mentioned.
    I personally think that if Mitchell and Said were sitting on a table having dinner, there would more of an agreement than a disagreement in the way they connect the East and the West. They would both agree that the West distorts the actual reality of the East through the creation of their own perception. This intentional creation is part of a discourse of power and control the West believes in and sticks to.
    It was amazing how Said acknowledges that Orientalism ignores the human side of the people and overlooks the complexity and the diversity within the region of ME itself.
    I would add to your argument that, this class and all the adequately assigned readings progressively make me understand that the West vs. East division we live in is indeed an outcome of so many complexities that accumulated over the years of the decades. There is the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the Napoleon invasion of Egypt for example that add to this division. But I think this is all because one side of it exerts to control by silencing the other side and unrealistically
    The divide b/w the East and the West is exhausted and moving to the worse especially with the Israeli and Palestinian conflict, the Iran and the U.S. ongoing tensions and 9/11. One needs to welcome the opportunity to understand the other and look at the human side of the other.
    S.A.A

    ReplyDelete