Sunday, April 22, 2012

Technology as a form of resistance


During the Arab Spring, the Western media focused heavily on the usage of social media.  In particular, social media was analyzed as a tool for the organization and spread of demonstrations that ultimately ousted several long-standing regimes in the Middle East.  The internet and tools such as Facebook, Twitter, and Youtube were trumpeted as playing a key role as new ways of subverting repressive measures.  One of the aftermaths of the Arab Spring was a strong and at times annoying focus by the Western media as if these specific internet tools were directly responsible for revolution.  At times, one could not help but think that this was the first time a resistance movement in the Middle East has utilized the internet (or modern technology for that matter).  Some commentators even ignored the human factor to the point that someone could be forgiven for thinking that these tools were directly responsible for the Arab Spring rather than a tool for their success.  The usage of technology and new forms of media has played a key and little understood role in defining Middle Eastern politics. 
                Al Jazeera became a sort of “boogeyman” in the eyes of American commentators, politicians, and journalists during the Bush administration.  Although such thinly-veiled criticisms of those opposed to the Iraq War and “War on Terror” were not uncommon from the Bush administration (see France), Al Jazeera was at times signaled out for subverting American policy.   The impression one received from the Western media was that Al Jazeera had a radical agenda directly opposed to the spread of “democracy” and “freedom” to the Middle East.  Nothing could have been further from the truth, but this suggestion was always implicit.  Al Jazeera has played a key role in regional affairs over the last decade, but it has not been a subversive role.  Rather, in the true spirit of Benedict Anderson, Al Jazeera has played a role in developing a new Arab consciousness.   Its popularity within the Arab world (and even abroad) gave it the ability to influence and shape thought throughout the Middle East.  While the social media documented in the previous paragraph played a key role on a micro level, it was the reporting of Al Jazeera and other news agencies that helped shape the conversation on the Arab Spring at a national, regional, and even international level.  Scholars such as Lawrence Pintak have indicated that Al Jazeera is well-placed and willing to create a new Arab community in a modern and globalized sense.  In the case of Al Jazeera, modern technology has played a key role in creating a new and powerful media voice. 
                On the flip side, the usage of technology by fundamentalist groups has been well-documented (including in some of my blog entries).  While protesters in the Arab Spring were asking for values such as freedom, liberty, and democracy that carry very modern connotations, fundamentalists groups such as Al-Qaeda are arguing against this very modernity.  Still, it is worth noting that these fundamentalist groups have fully embraced technology for the spread of their ideology.  When the media or analysts study fundamentalist groups, one of the natural places to get unfiltered information is on internet sites.  Even proclaimed anti-modern movements have utilized modern technology to its fullest advantage.  While the Arab Spring was unique and unprecedented in its scope and impact, its usage of modern technology was not.  The internet, satellite news, and other facets of the modern have long played a role in shaping and influencing Middle Eastern politics. 

BDF

No comments:

Post a Comment