Globalization’s
influence to liberation has been discussed in both Mark Duffield’s article “The
New Development-Security Terrain and Mohammed G. Alkadry’s article, “Colonialism,
Globalization and Democracy in the Decolonized Middle East”. Duffeild mentioned
in his article that under the influence of globalization, governmental
decisions that used to be hierarchical, territorial, and bureaucratic are now
more polyarchial and non-territorial (Duffeild, 343). Governments and international
organizations are getting more interested in collective interests, such as global
peace and security and this is mainly influenced by globalization, as cultures
and societies become more interconnected to each other. Through examining the
impacts of post-colonized societies in the Middle East,
Alkadry also pointed out that many societies desire for independence from
institutional orders such as colonizers and more networking relations with
other states.
Alkadry discussed
the political situation of countries under colonial powers. He mentioned how
colonial powers in the Middle East opposed any
attempts of local leaders creating any form of democratic institutions. Colonialism
became a form of confinement, a situation opposing liberation. Globalization
influence the forming of liberation as it passes the message of freedom, human
rights, and security. Globalization forces
colonizers out of their occupied territories which brought the Middle East to where it is today, modern, diverse, but
rich with traditional cultures. Colonial powers, by delineating arbitrary
states, affected the notion of civil society and solidarity, which are
important to the Islamic traditions. In other words, by eliminating the sense
of solidarity among the Arab societies, the colonizers are indirectly
responsible for eliminating the sense of interconnectedness Middle
East once had. Globalization’s role in influencing this, has
positively redirected the Middle East back to
their solidarity traditions of sharing and interconnecting.
Globalization
has underlined the importance of freedom and thus prioritized what the people
wants and needs. People want the sense of belonging, security, equality and
respect. Globalization enforces these rights which are generally human rights.
Globalization encourages the international community to interconnect with each
other, and build the need or reason for countries to network, creating a global
circle, where no one is alone. Although not all Middle Eastern countries crave
for complete liberation, the idea of Globalization has made clear to
governments that society needs interconnection, relation with other states. Governments
has come to realize that no states can work alone, and that solidarity is
needed from other states to overcome problems such as conflicts, natural
disasters, and threat of international security. Globalization shows that
colonialism is only disadvantaging many sides, as it pulls away state’s opportunity
to interconnect with other states, which reduces chances for world peace and
security.
Rossa D.
Sorry to comment on two of your posts in a row, Rossa, but what you wrote is something I've been thinking a lot about. I agree that colonialism is a system of confinement that in effect would be opposed to any form of liberation. I agree that the notions of solidarity and civil society are important to the region and to Islam, but I disagree in that the sharing and interconnectedness you ascribe to globalization is in fact due to the processes of globalization, in any of the definitions.
ReplyDeleteI disagree because I do not think that it was globalization that liberated the oppressed, forced the colonizers out of the 'arbitrary states' and occupied territories, brought the "diverse, modern, traditional cultures" back into being, rather I think globalization has the opposite effect. I believe strongly that it was variety of causes that led to the decolonisation of the SWANA region (haha) but that, more than anything, it was Islam as a liberation ideology, the oppressiveness of the colonial governments excessive monarchs as well as economic strains due to world wars and the realization by colonial powers that empire upkeep is extremely costly and maybe not worth the manpower and costs. I think the globalization of neoliberal capitalism has created competition between the states, destroying solidarity and creating a very un-Islamic doctrine to the behest of investors.
SM