Although there
were a couple of articles assigned for this week, I was particularly interested
in the article by Mahmood Mamdani titled, “Good Muslim, Bad Muslim: A political
Perspective on Culture and terrorism. What is interesting about Mamdani’s
article is that he mentioned how people often think of terrorism from only the
historical perspective and ignoring the political. People often blame Osama bin
Laden’s Religion, instead of the political message he was trying to convey when
he attacked the world trade center. In consequence, people blame Islam and
thinks of all Muslims as terrorists. However, this is not true, not all Muslims
are terrorists.
Globalization has
made international trade and foreign relations a big deal. In fact, when the
world trade center fell to the ground, the world seems incontrollable. With the
dependency of society on modern technology, even a tiny incident may harshly
disturb a system. The 9/11 incident is unforgettable for many, and is still
causing them to hate the Muslims. However, why is it that the Muslims are blamed?
Many of the Muslims in South East Asia did not
have anything to do with the incident. Contemporary Islam is a global
civilization: fewer Muslims live in the Middle East than in Africa or in South
and Southeast Asia.
Mamdani
discusses how the Islamic culture seems to have no history, politics, and no
debates. The papers these days often show how all the Muslims just conform to
the culture, where in reality Muslims conform not to the culture but to the
religion. The mistake that people often make is separating the moderate and
genuine Islam. They understood that the liberal Muslims follows moderate Islam,
which does not encourage fundamentalism, and that the genuine Islam, who
follows traditional teachings have potential to be terrorists. The truth is
terrorism does not really derive from any aspect of Islam. Terrorists just use
religion for a reason to make a political move. The impacts of their move were
global. Now almost every man with a Muslim name had difficulty entering the United States,
and in the era of Globalization and Migration, this emerges to be even a bigger
problem. Abu El-Haj also talked in his article titled Reimagining Citizenship
as Critical Practice about the harsh treatments that Muslims encounter across
the United States.
El-Haj shared the stories of Muslim youths in the US, where they were threatened, bullied,
and hated. In an era of Globalizations, where many Arabs are moving in the US, this
false image of American youngsters about Muslims has negatively affected the
lives of others.
From this
example about terrorism, we should learn that globalization does not only increase
interconnectivity of states and international trade, but it also makes every
cross-cultural incident or any incidents that involve different cultures
important to be examined and dealt with. People can no longer hide small
problems, as global interconnectivity will find any kind of secrets. Internet
access to websites such as wikileaks will make information easier to access,
but more difficult to determine its validity. Therefore, because globalization
could not and should not be stopped, society should also prepare for it, in
order to minimize the negative impacts it can bring to our world.
Rossa D.
Hi Rossa,
ReplyDeleteThere are some obvious potential issues that globalization can cause which you address in your article. I was wondering if you think there are effective ways for globalization to promote more positive impacts such as addressing these stereotypes? Also, you mention that society should prepare for globalization to minimize its negative impacts. What do you think societies should do to prepare?
BDF
Your assertion that globalization can not and should not be stopped and that we need to prepare for its negative impacts interests me. I would press you further and ask, how do we prevent its negative impacts? You write that globalization as a form of technological inter-connectedness blows up issues that could once be covered up. If terrorism committed by a small group of Muslims causes the reaction to Islam that it did, how can we keep from perpetuating these stereotypes. Despite our global technological interconnectedness, people especially in the US seem to fail in their understanding of Islam. I think our discussion last week of the internet's utilization and importance to the outcomes of the Arab Spring events is important to think about in regards to portraying 'the true democratic aspects of the religion.' Is this necessary? Why does Islam have to 'prove itself' and defy stereotypes?
ReplyDeleteSM