I feel
like there is something I am missing in this book, Colonising Egypt by Mitchell. Reading the additional section from
Mitchell, the main thing I am taking away is just how eerily organized
absolutely everything is. Look (remember):
As well as student monitors who instructed and supervised,
there were monitors who promoted students up or down in the order of seating,
monitors who inspected the slates, monitors who supplied and sharpened pens,
monitors who checked on students who were not in their position, and a
monitor-general who checked on the monitors.
There are around ~5 layers of monitors monitoring each
other. I feel like there is no trust in these systems. These schools conjure a
very grey color in my mind. But beyond that, its really interesting to ponder
on what things they thought were of value, like:
All instruction was received standing, which was said to be
better for the health
Of course these schools were structured in a very particular
way, which is why Mitchell is telling us about them. Egypt wanted to people
modern. The time frame was during the Industrial Revolutions of America and
Britain. So, with this mindset, people desired everything to be overly
structured, because the belief was that structure produced more and better
quality objects. Thus specific views about education were popping up ‘cross the
Britain and, then, Egypt like:
learning is a process of discipline, inspection and
continuous obedience; order and discipline of modern schooling were to be the
hallmark and the method of a new form of political power
Add to these views the admitted reason
for structuring Egypt this way, because Egyptian leaders wanted to create a
modern people; seeing schools like this in London and Paris, of course copying
is the way to progress. This is the problem though, times like the Industrial
Revolution put countries ahead not because they copied each other, but because
they created new ideas themselves. If all someone does is copy their neighbor,
they will never have a chance at being ahead. Now though I feel like copying is
a waste of time, I thought it was really smart to choose education as the way
and place to implement desired changes long term:
To change the tastes and habits of an entire people,
politics had to seize upon the individual, and by the new means of education
make him or her into a modern political subject - frugal, innocent and, above
all, busy.
After the ‘modern’ schools had been implemented, the fellow
critiques about it were clear about the changing views within the country. It
becomes very clear that as Egypt attempts to modernize, it relates ‘order’ with
‘modern and relates ‘disorder, “chaos”’ with ‘old Egypt.’ This association is a
blatant example of western colonization, because the west is directing Egypt in
what is deemed to be true ‘order’ vs. ‘Egyptian disorder.’ Mitchell sums this
up here:
Just as the model schools offered the model of a modern
system of power, this image of the old style of teaching was also the image of
existing Egyptian society. Movement is haphazard and undisciplined, space is
cramped, communication is uncertain, the presence of authority is intermittent,
individuals are all unalike and uncoordinated, disorder threatens to break in
at any point, and order can be reestablished only by the swift and physical
demonstration of power.
This excerpt really speaks for itself. There is one other
short quote that I feel represents the point of this chapter. It describes
power and power relations in Egypt and the effect on how/why these schools were
chosen and on why schools were added to mixture. Schools were added because
just adjusting the layout of the city wasn’t enough. ‘Updating’ the city layout
did not have enough of an effect here. Because:
Power now sought to work not only upon
the exterior of the body but also 'from the inside out' - by shaping the
individual mind
And this is where I’ll bow out, because I’m past the limit.
But I do really enjoy this quote. I think it represents colonization in general
really well.
-W.H.B.
No comments:
Post a Comment